The article is at best a reflection of what has happened. First of all Andhra Pradesh is not part of Central India but of South India. Be that apart, the author started with 82% high indebtedness of farming sector but failed to relate the micro finance to the farm sector because microfinance did not reach the farm sector in reducing or enhancing that debt burden. Interest burden reaching usurious levels in the name of easy access axed affordability on one hand and extortion practices on the other. In fact, Banks like ICICI, Citi etc also resorted to worse extortionary practices prior to the AP stepping into the shoes of regulator. What one should realise is that in the case of AP the player has become a regulator creating conflicting interest up front. This was preserved by the RBI's acceptance of Malegam Committee recommendations and accentuated by categorising MFI lendings under the priority sector category. The MFIs are either NBFCs or Companies registered under the Companies Act and therefore they are actually corporate borrowers. Therefore, whatever due diligence is to be done by Banks in lending to the corporates should have been done by them. Instead in their anxiety to achieve priority sector lending through arm chair lending with this window of micro finance opportunity available they went in for competitive populistic lending. This has set the micro finance sector to go for a toss.
- Yerram Raju