This refers to the news item titled “Subbarao warns against casino banking” (FE, November 18). One more interesting term has been added to the existing vocabulary of bankers and students of financial management. “Casino banking” has been termed as the practice whereby a commercial bank engages in unduly speculative or risky financial activities with the aim of achieving high profits. Some years ago (2009), the term “narrow banking” had been in vogue. A narrow bank, in its narrow sense, had then been defined as the system under which a bank places its funds in risk-free assets with maturity periods matching its liability maturity profile so that there is no problem relating to asset liability mismatch and the quality of assets remains intact without leading to emergence of sub-standard assets. This extreme risk averseness has been also dubbed as “lazy banking” and “zombie banking”. Other such terms often referred to are: “class banking”, “mass banking”, “inclusive banking”, “logical banking”, “safe banking”, etc. What next? “Sitting-on-the-fence banking”—neither going this way nor that? “Water-on-the-duck’s-back banking”—no policy guidelines ever affect this sector? Perhaps it’s time for RBI to come out with an A to Z primer (arm-chair banking to zombie banking) to educate the layman about such interesting definitions.
- JS Broca, New Delhi FE
No comments:
Post a Comment