Monday, April 8, 2013

FSLRC’s monetary policy myopia

FSLRC’s recommendations are a serious blow to the independence of the Reserve Bank of India


.........The Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission’s (FSLRC’s) recommendations on monetary policy remind one of Gresham’s law that bad money drives out good money. In this case, the FSLRC, which has the laudable objective of enhancing accountability and independence for the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), has in its recommendations made it extremely difficult for RBI to achieve those objectives.......

Read - Mint

1 comment:

www.warriersblog.com said...

The idea of creating a Unified Financial Agency for all financial regulators except RBI, truncating RBI by separating Public debt Management and keeping the agency doing that work (presumably with the same work force) in RBI premises, later UFA subsuming even RBI all give a feeling that the FSLRC was not allowed to ‘apply its intelligent mind’ and in the eagerness to satisfy all, and so fast, it has forgotten its own brief. Perhaps the purpose would be served better, if RBI is allowed to function with its present mandates, a coordination committee sorts out issues among the remaining regulators and if GOI aim is to reduce the number of regulators, merge with RBI, the agencies outside RBI one by one, as work stabilizes. The twin goals of one Unified Financial Agency and managing the man-power-related issued mentioned here would be better achieved this way.
Our finance ministry and FSLRC, in a hurry to resolve minor issues like occasional friction between or among officials holding top positions in different work areas in the financial sector, perhaps ignored the evolution of the role of Reserve Bank of India and the care with which RBI has nurtured the financial sector concurrently successfully safeguarding GOI interests even in several areas which do not come under traditional central banking functions. When found necessary, at the appropriate time, new institutions were built by RBI in association with GOI to transfer responsibilities which either conflicted with its core functions or became unwieldy or unmanageably heavy.
Time is not opportune for dismantling or truncating RBI which is doing creditably well as is being admitted in several international forums. Any regulatory changes should be to consolidate and restate the roles so far evolved and should not be a tool for Finance Ministry or any government department to usurp powers or responsibilities now with statutory regulators.