............The bank argued that the nomination of three directors, challenged by Madhu Kapur in the high court, was with the approval of the shareholders. In any case, the Banking Regulation Act did not allow challenge to the decision of the board of directors in a court of law. Therefore, the petition of Madhu Kapur was not maintainable and should not be heard by the high court, it was argued.........
The very purpose of VITALINFO is to provide a platform for wider dissemination of updated information related to and happening of events in and around RBI.
No comments:
Post a Comment