Dear Shri Warrier,
Your article is ahead of its time i.e; not digestible to the intellectually challenged bureaucracy at this point of time. Rationale wage policy still eludes us. It is learnt that Shri Rajiv Takru , Secretary Financial Services, has agreed to the fact that the pensioners who retired before 2002 may be given 100% neutralisation in DA subject to fact that the entire expenditure would be met from the wage load agreed to by IBA and UNIONS. It means existing employees must agree to share the burden of long back retired employees. Will they agree? Our own D.G.(Admin) says that 70% of wage revision should be on fixed criterion and 30% should be a variable component.How is he going to cajole the UNIONS? IBA has postponed the talks which was scheduled to be held on 4 March indefinitely so as to receive necessary guidance from MoF which itself does not know how to proceed.Are wages to be fixed on the basis of views of semi literate leaders of Unions who have their own axe to grind (More LEVY) to delay the agreement or on the basis of an enlightened policy to attract talent to banking sector? Should not this matter engage the attention of FM Shri Chidambram, RBI GOV, Shri Montek Singh, Shri Raghuraman, Chief Economic Advisor etc; who have stake in India's growth where banking is of paramount importance?
- Sitendra Kumar



