Sunday, July 10, 2011

Lamenting chavanni’s demise - Sudheendra Kulkarni

Chavanni died last week. But the Reserve Bank of India’s unemotional announcement couched in official language—‘Coins of denomination of 25 paise will cease to be legal tender from June 30, 2011’—conveyed nothing of the immense sadness associated with the death of this lowly coin and, with it, the passing of an entire era in the man-money relationship in India. Coins of 1, 2, 3, 5, 10 and 20 paise denominations had vanished long ago. Now chavanni (four annas) is gone. Soon, athanni (eight annas or 50 paise coin) too will probably be dead ‘demonitised’, in RBI’s pitiless lingo. All money from then onwards will be counted only in rupees. When that happens, there will be nothing left of the species called ‘paisa’ in India. Has anyone paused to spare a thought on what the death of ‘paisa’ means for the social, cultural and psychological history of India?  Mourning resurrects memories. I remember the many things I did with chavanni and with other coins of lesser value when I was young. The first ‘rice plate’ I ate, while on a school outing, cost only 25 paise. The cinema ticket in an itinerant tent theatre that I frequented in my mother’s village during vacation months cost less—10 paise (for kids). The ‘pocket money’ of five paise that my grandfather occasionally gave us when I was studying in first standard was enough for me to buy a handful of locally made sweets in the next-door village shop. The boatman who ferried us across the river to the village on the other bank took no money at all. In the barter system that was still prevalent in our village in the 1960s, my grandfather gave him—and also the shoe-maker, barber and other rural service providers—grains, jaggery and other farm produce after harvest. It was an era when the rich were called ‘paisewale’. Now, with paisa itself on the brink of extinction, the rich are called millionaires and billionaires, and their millions and billions are counted not even in rupees but in dollars. How much India has changed in just 40-50 years!
IE

New coins released.............

Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee along with MoS Namo Narayan Meena releasing a new series of coins in New Delhi on Friday

(For mroe details see VITALINFO of 9th July)

'RBI right on rate hikes'

Conceding that intrerest rates were on the higher side and that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has had to raise interest rates frequently.....

Read........

If inflation's peaked so have interest rates: Chakrabarty

Just about a fortnight before the first quarterly review of the monetary policy statement by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), deputy governor K C Chakrabarty has made a statement which reflects the central bank’s state of mind on interest rate scenario. When asked whether interest rate had peaked, on the sidelines of finance minister Pranab Mukherjee’s meeting with the public sector bank chiefs in the capital yesterday, Chakrabarty initially feigned ignorance. “How would I know?... If inflation has peaked, interest rates, too, would. And if it hasn't, then interest rate hasn't peaked,” he said. RBI is slated to announce the first quarterly review of the monetary policy on July 26. This will be done in a meeting with the chief executives of major banks. In its mid-quarterly review in June, the RBI raised key policy rates by 25 basis points (bps) in its effort to tame inflation. It had raised the short-term lending (repo) rate by 25 bps to 7.50 per cent and the short-term borrowing (reverse repo) rate was moved up by a similar margin to 6.5 per cent. (A basis point is one hundredth of a percentage point — 0.01 per cent). “Going forward, notwithstanding both signs of moderation in commodity prices and some deceleration in growth, domestic inflation risks remain high. Against this backdrop, the monetary policy stance remains firmly anti-inflationary. Recognising that in the current circumstances, some short-run deceleration in growth may be unavoidable to bring inflation under control,” the RBI had said in its June review. Inflation rose to 9.06 per cent in May after dropping to 8.66 per cent in April. Prior to this, it had been over 9 per cent for the previous four months. The data of June will be released on Tuesday and will factor the impact of fuel price rise. The second round of impact will be evident later.
BS 

Centre to seek review of SC rulings on black money, SPOs

....... The government feels the HPC and its members -- directors of CBI, Enforcement Directorate (ED), Intelligence Bureau (IB), Revenue Intelligence and chiefs of Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB), Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), Foreign Trade and Tax division, as well as deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI) -- are mandated to submit periodic probe status reports to the court......

Continue reading..........

Micro-mismatch

The draft Micro Finance Institutions (Development and Regulation) Bill, meant to provide a legal framework to an otherwise unregulated sector in the Indian financial system, is an attempt to over-regulate and micro-manage the microfinance sector. The draft can at best be termed a mimic of legislation on usurious practices and moneylenders that is in place in several states of the country. Buzzwords such as “systemically important” replace “exploitation”, “expropriation” provides the modern setting to justify pervasive regulation. The draft bill adds a retrograde touch to the stalled process of financial sector reforms. The bill, if made law, will reduce competition in this industry as it hopes to regulate net margins. It will limit new entry into the industry. From the point of view of the customer, such regulation can push customers back to moneylenders who will now be outside these regulatory requirements. The present draft represents the microfinance industry as “extended arms” of banks, allowing for bank-like regulatory architecture for microfinance firms. This could potentially stall any progress in the microfinance industry. Capital adequacy requirements work for banks and not for non-deposit-taking financial institutions. In allowing a regulator to set “capital adequacy based on risk weights for assets and deployment of funds”, the draft bill fails to recognise that not all microfinance companies are deposit-taking, and even if so, the extent of deposit-taking, by virtue of the business model itself, is limited to and well below the maturity mismatch possible in its balance sheet. Prudential norms for banks lending to microfinance companies are already in place. Financial regulation is required to contain systemic risk and protect consumers. Systemically important microfinance institutions cannot be defined in terms of the number of clients they cover, but whether the failure of the institution could bring down the financial system altogether and, consequently, impact the underlying real economy. This is not an issue the microfinance industry poses today. The real issue is that of customer protection. An issue of consumer protection does not require micro-management of the business enterprise, but an effective arrangement to ensure that contracting parties are doing so knowing fully the consequences of non-adherence. The government may do well by looking into consumer protection more carefully than stifling microfinancial innovation.
IE

The New MFI Bill: Challenges before RBI

In the past two years the microfinance sector has witnessed an euphoric and unregulated growth as over-regulation and stoppage of lending in one state. The draft Microfinance Institutions (development and regulation) Bill 2011 seeks to bring some clarity and uniformity of rules to this sphere, reports Gopika Gopakumar of CNBC-TV18. The key feature of this Bill is that it will bring all microfinance services under one regulator – the Reserve Bank of India.  The Bill also proposes setting up of Centre and state level councils to advise the government on policies for the development of the sector. The central council will consists of officers from Finance and Rural Development Ministries, the RBI, SIDBI, NABARD and NHB besides six experts. The state advisory councils will have representatives from the state microfinance sector, the RBI and banks. They will advise on lending, recovery methods and grievance redressal mechanism.
What the New Microfinance Bill 2011 says?
> All microfinance companies must first register with the RBI before they begin operation.
> If activities of MFIs are found to be hurting the interest of clients, the regulator can issue 'cease and desist' order and can even cancel the registration.
> If the MFI is not satisfied with RBI's actions, then it can appeal to the central government, which will have the final say. The Bill also directs all MFIs to set up a reserve fund which cannot be used without RBI's permission. All MFIs will also be required submit their balance sheets to an RBI approved auditor. The bill gives sweeping powers to the RBI.  Among other things, the regulator will have a say on how much loans can be disbursed by the MFIs, the numbers of borrowers who can avail these loans and also the areas where they can operate. The RBI can also delegate an inspecting authority to look into the books of MFIs.
Will the Reserve Bank be able to handle such intricate details about hundreds of tiny companies working in far off villages?
Usha Thorat, Former Deputy Governor, RBI, said, "Consumer protection objective is most difficult areas of regulation to enforce because it requires various process. It is not like I go to a bank offsite and onsite inspection and look at their terms and procedures, look at the riskiness of assets or at their mismanagement." Reddy Subrahmanyam, Principal Secretary, Rural Devpt, AP, said, "Our understanding is that the existing RBI machinery or the proposed ombudsman may not be a solution. It may not be adequate to look at ground level realities. I think that's the fact which we need to discuss further." The new draft Bill says microfinance is not money lending and therefore not under the state governments' jurisdiction. But states like Andhra Pradesh are questioning the validity of this.  However, legal experts are dismissing this contention. HP Ranina, Central Board Member, RBI said, “What the Bill says is that money lending done by MFIs is not deemed to be money lending. But that is right and fair for the simple reason that even banks do money lending, even non-banking financial organizations do money lending."  "But yet they are in the purview of RBI, who is the regulator of all banks and banks necessarily lend money to the outside world. The Money Lenders Act which is covered by Constitution, which is part of state subject generally applies to unorganised sector were money lending is done." But RBI believes state government opposition could pose problems. There are many skeptics and it is yet to be seen what changes will happen before the bill becomes law.

Watch the video..........

Andhra Pradesh lambasts microfinance bill, wants full rethink

In a 1200-word, aggressive response, the Andhra Pradesh government has called for a rethink on the microfinance bill introduced by the finance ministry. “Even if the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) becomes the sole regulator of the sector, the fallout of coercive recovery practices including suicides becomes a subject of state........