Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Dr.Y.V.REDDY : A Practical Banker with the Courage of Conviction

ET Lifetime Achievement Award seeks to salute those who have conquered the peaks of corporate achievements & set examples for the current generation of India Inc leaders

Sometime in late 2008, when Prime Minister Manmohan Singh met his British counterpart Gordon Brown, a fair bit of their conversation revolved around the role of Yaga Venugopal Reddy, the governor of the Reserve Bank of India until September 2008. Brown was lavish in his praise for Reddy, especially for his handling of the financial sector in India - one of the few economies to emerge unscathed from the crisis in overseas credit markets. Much of the praise for Reddy since then has been from his peers and topnotch economists abroad. Ironically, for the better part of his tenure as Governor of the RBI between 2003 and 2008, Reddy had to cope with a lot of criticism for being somewhat conservative in his stance on a range of issues - opening up the Indian banking sector, free flow of capital, placing fetters on the real estate sector, the use of the country’s foreign exchange reserves, innovation in financial products and so on. But in hindsight, several of the former RBI governor's moves appear prescient, whether it's tightening of home loans or restrictions on securitised assets. Indian banks are far more safer and well-capitalised today, thanks to his policies. The ET jury recognised some of these in choosing him for this year’s Lifetime Achievement Award. In faraway London, Reddy was happy to hear about it. Reddy had recognised much earlier that financial regulation in the rest of the world had developed a life of its own. And having sensed the infirmities, he charted out a different path. Unlike many other central banks, RBI has had to do a deft balancing act in fulfilling several objectives: ensuring price and financial stability, regulating banking and non-banking segments, and acting as the merchant banker to the government. During his stewardship, Reddy tried to blend continuity with change - something he set out to do when he took over in 2003. And he did succeed, going by the fact that the Indian economy grew at over 8% during the better part of his tenure while keeping average inflation at a tad over 5%. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, a former RBI governor himself, had once described the Indian central bank governor’s job as the loneliest. That thought must have crossed Reddy’s mind too when he resisted tremendous pressure from fiscal policy managers to ease monetary policy levers. Although the RBI is not fully independent, he came across as one determined to stand his ground. It’s a measure of his success that the government finally saw merit in his views, especially on the bank ownership issue. Reddy has often shown, albeit subtly, signs of being an independent central banker, quite like many of his peers. Reddy’s first love has been academics. It's not that there haven't been civil servants-turned-central bankers earlier at the Reserve Bank. Former finance secretaries such as M Narasimham, RN Malhotra and S Venkitaramanan had made the transition in the past, but Reddy had to operate in an era when each nuance of monetary policy was closely tracked by the financial markets. Comparisons are often made, however unfair they may sound. In comparison to Bimal Jalan -- his predecessor -- Reddy is seen as more of a micro manager. Some would blame this on his training as a civil servant. But Reddy does not lack backers either. His predecessor Jalan was perceived as a governor with vision, a clear thinker, more practical, yet distant. But there's little doubt about Reddy’s intellectual prowess; his personal skills set him apart from the rest. He was also seen as far more practical than many of his predecessors, and perhaps what’s more important, he had the courage of conviction to go that extra mile.
ET

The intervention question redux

In short, RBI should actively build reserves when the currency is appreciating and build enough of a buffer to fall back on when there is a sharp swing to the other side. The other is to intervene more strategically and manipulate market expectations to ensure its efficacy. Appearing to defend a level for the rupee might not be a bad idea after all and might just induce exporters to sell at that level, increasing the chance of successful intervention. Intervention might not always be a viable option for RBI but when it does choose to intervene, there are perhaps ways to make it work better.  

Read........

God and the central banker

Can central bankers play god to the markets? India’s central bank chief Duvvuri Subbarao does not believe so. In doing so, the Reserve Bank of India governor, a physics student, has taken refuge in quantum mechanics. Subbarao takes the example of Einstein, who could not reconcile to the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics all through his life. Einstein famously said – “God does not play dice”. Less known perhaps is the retort of his friend and mentor Niels Bohr who said – “Albert, stop telling God what he can or cannot do”. Subbarao draws this parallel in arguing that a central bank cannot tell markets what to do. “We have to take market signals as given,” Subbarao said in New York at a recent IMF meeting.
In fact, he went on to say that central bank decisions get more validity if the market endorses them. Central bankers have always enjoyed an elevated status in the financial world, possibly because of the wide-ranging powers they have enjoyed. True, the sheen has come off at times. Liaquat Ahamed referred to this in Lords of Finance when he wrote about central bankers ruling the financial world in the late 1920s — Benjamin Strong Jr of the New York Federal Reserve, Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Émile Moreau of the Banque de France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank. The Wall Street crash of 1929 and the depression that ensued crippled an entire generation and set the stage for the second World War. The orthodoxy of the central bankers of the day in trying to adhere to the gold standard was a prime cause. The media, of course, has played a big role in creating this mythical creature called the central banker. In 1999, Time magazine ran a cover story titled ‘The Committee To Save The World’ featuring then Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan along with Robert Rubin and Larry Summers (then secretary and deputy secretary of Treasury) for their role in averting a global meltdown after Asia’s tiger economies faced a debt repayment crisis. This stereotype was particularly so of Alan Greenspan, under whom interest rates were ultra low and the market was flooded with dollars. To many, Greenspan, whose career at the Federal Reserve spanned nearly two decades, was god. All that came crashing down when the financial crisis broke in 2008 and the very same low interest rates were blamed for the subprime mess and housing bubble in the United States. Subsequently, it’s been mostly downhill for central bankers. The Economist, in a piece in Oct 2010, accused Bank of England Governor Mervyn King of playing god when in a speech he savaged the performance of Britain’s banks before the crisis and criticised the new Basel 3 proposals as too soft. Tongue in cheek, the Economist said trying to reinvent finance was a lot more fun than shifting interest rates by 25 basis points once in a while. But to be fair, most central bankers haven’t claimed a god status. It was something that was mostly thrust on them. But the one who takes the cake is Goldman Sachs boss Lloyd Blankfein who famously said that banks serve a social purpose and are doing “god’s work”. This was after reckless investment banks, in search of supernormal profits, plunged the advanced economies into recession. It was the central bankers who had to rush in with trillions of dollars to ward off armageddon. 
http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2011/10/04/god-and-the-central-banker/

Restore loan servicing facility to customer, bank told

Thiruvananthapuram : Is it within the legitimate rights of a bank to seek to move a standard asset in the form of a vehicle loan to a non-banking finance company (NBFC) located at a place away from the customer and without taking him on board? No, according to the ruling given by the Office of the Banking Ombudsman (BO) attached to the Regional Office of Reserve Bank, Thiruvananthapuram. In a case reported by the BO for Kerala, the Union Territory of Lakshadweep and Mahe, the complainant had taken a loan for a light commercial vehicle from a bank branch near to his house. Despite the account being a standard asset, the bank had gone ahead to sell it to an NBFC which had an office 100 km away from the transferee bank branch and the residence of the complainant. On taking up the matter, the bank submitted to the office of the BO that his loan was part of a loan portfolio assigned to a registered NBFC. The NBFC had also taken over the servicing responsibilities of the loan. The bank said the assignment was in terms of the terms and conditions accepted by the complainant at the time of sanction of the loan. But the office of BO found that as per the terms and conditions, it was stated inter alia that the borrower would continue to discharge in full all his obligations under the loan terms and other transaction documents to the bank only. It observed that the borrower cannot be put to inconvenience by requiring him to approach an NBFC for the monthly repayments.  The bank was advised that the complainant's request to the bank to continue the servicing of his vehicle loan at the original branch was legitimate and the bank had to consider it favourably. The bank eventually complied with the BO's instruction in the matter.
(Disclaimer: RBI does not vouch the propriety or legality of orders passed by the Banking Ombudsman. The object of releasing the details of cases is merely for the purpose of dissemination of information on the working of the BO Scheme.)
HBL 

States told to make electronic payments

Only 5% of the 600,000 villages, towns and cities in India have a bank branch, and only 40% of the country’s population has access to a bank account, according to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). As part of its financial inclusion (providing banking and other financial services to the unbanked) road map, RBI has asked banks to cover 73,000 villages with population of at least 2,000 by the end of this fiscal. The ensuing action by banks has resulted in several million new accounts being opened, but many of these see no action. The finance ministry’s plan could address that issue, too.......

HC directs Centre, RBI to act tough against online fraud firms

CHANDIGARH: Tightening noose around the companies involved in online frauds, the Punjab and Haryana high court on Tuesday directed the Centre as well as the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to act tough against the companies involved in online fraud, including seizing their bank accounts. The HC directed the Centre to proceed with any action in order to stop the fraudulent practices, which are being perpetrated by various companies based in India and abroad. It added; " Authorities may take steps, including the seizing of bank accounts, which have been opened by those companies in various banks in order to siphoning of funds of gullible public." While issuing the directions, division bench of the HC, comprising acting Chief Justice M M Kumar and Justice R N Raina also issued notice to the Centre as well as the UT administration and state governments of Punjab and Haryana for November 8 to file response on the issue. The case would come up for further hearing on November 8. The matter had reached before the HC through public interest litigation (PIL) filed by a Zirakpur resident Nardeep Saini and 29 other petitioners from Punjab, Haryana and UT. The petitioners had alleged that three companies had fleeced a large number of innocent persons to the tune of Rs 1,500cr. It was also contended that a large number of Indians were lured in the online investment scheme with assured results of doubling the amount within 10 months.
TOI 

Bankers want a break from monetary tightening measures

Top bankers on Tuesday dropped ample hints to the Reserve Bank of India that it's time it took a breather from its monetary tightening cycle............

Read.............

Banks take up exchange rate volatility with RBI

The volatility in exchange rate and increased liability for companies are issues that bankers took up with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in pre-policy meet ahead of the second quarter review of the monetary policy on October 25. For companies that have taken large foreign currency loans, rupee depreciation was resulting in foreign currency liabilities going up sharply which could lead to stress in repayments. “When the domestic interest rates were rising, firms were arranging credit from overseas with interest rate differential of at least 300 basis points. This helped them keep the credit cost under check but with rupee depreciating by 12 per cent since June 2011, foreign currency liabilities have gone up further,” said a banker. The capital expenditure has come to a complete standstill and fresh investments into projects are also strangulated as high interest rates are eating into the profitability of companies, bankers told the central bank. Bankers have asked RBI to pause for a prolonged period by not raising interest rates.  IBA chief executive officer R Ramakrishnan told reporters after attending the meeting that the capex has come to a complete naught. "The credit growth that is happening only for the pipeline of proposals sanctioned. So the bankers have asked for a pause in interest rates for a prolonged period of time so that credit can pick up.” Bankers also appraised the RBI about how the extra government borrowing of Rs 52,800 crore will impact the treasury income of banks as most banks have extra government bond holding — SLR (statutory liquidity rat­io) holdings. The additional borrowing, which came as a surprise to the government securities market, has hardened bond yields by 10 to 15 basis points. “It will also result in a bit of crowding out as banks and companies will find it difficult to raise money from the debt market,” said a senior banker. Head of the Indian Banks Association MD Mallya said, “Credit growth is a big concern for banks. The rise in NPAs is also another problem. Exposure to select sectors like power was discussed at length.” The year-to-date credit growth is about 2.4 per cent while for the corresponding period last year it was 3.1 per cent. Though the year on year credit growth is a 20 per cent, it is more due to a poor base effect. After the pre-policy meet, RBI also had a special meeting on resource mobilisation. CEOs of all large state-owned banks such as SBI, Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank, Punjab National Bank and private banks such as ICICI Bank and HDFC Bank were among who attended the meeting chaired by RBI governor D Subbarao. Three Deputy Governors Subir Gokarn, K.C.Chakrabarty and H.R.Khan were present in the meeting.
FC 

CEOs of foreign banks told to oversee audit reviews

Tightening regulatory norms, the Reserve Bank asked chief executive officers of all the foreign banks to oversee their audit reviews. The notification comes against the backdrop of Rs 460 crore fraud of at a branch of foreign lender Citibank. " The reviews ( placed before the Audit Committee) may be put up to the local management committee or chief executive officer (foreign bank)," RBI said in a notification addressed to chief executives of all foreign banks operating in India. The notification also said that for all foreign banks operating in India, the CEOs would be responsible for effective oversight of regulatory and statutory compliance as also the audit process and the compliance thereof in respect of all operations in India.
FPJ

Oversee audit reviews: RBI to foreign banks

Tightening regulatory norms, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) today asked chief executive officers of all the foreign banks to oversee their audit reviews. "The reviews [placed before the Audit Committee] may be put up to the local management committee or chief executive officer [foreign bank]," the RBI said in a notification addressed to chief executives of all foreign banks operating in India. The notification also said that for all foreign banks operating in India, the CEOs would be responsible for effective oversight of regulatory and statutory compliance as also the audit process and the compliance thereof in respect of all operations in India. The RBI said the banks should identify areas or aspects which, as per their assessment, require to be brought up for review. These areas may be incorporated in a policy and approved by the board or local management committee, it added. The notification comes against the backdrop of Rs 460 crore fraud of at a branch of foreign lender Citibank. As many as 34 foreign banks, including global leaders such as HSBC and Deutsche Bank, are operating in the country.
BS

RBI removes restriction on FIIs buying MSI stock

MUMBAI: The Reserve Bank has removed the restriction on FIIs purchasing the shares of Maruti Suzuki India, following the compliance of their prescribed investment limit in the company. "RBI has...notified that the aggregate share holdings in MSI by FIIs under the Portfolio Investment Scheme (PIS) have gone below the prescribed trigger limit. Hence, this company has been removed from the caution list for FII investment and the restrictions placed on the purchase of shares of this company are withdrawn with immediate effect," the apex bank said in a statement.  It, however, did not provide details as to when the prescribed limit was crossed and by how much.  Maruti Suzuki is the country's largest carmaker. RBI monitors the ceilings on FII/NRI/PIO investments in Indian companies on a daily basis. For effective monitoring of foreign investment ceiling limits, RBI has fixed cut-off points that are two percentage points lower than the actual ceiling. The ceiling for overall investment for FIIs is 24 per cent of the paid up capital of the Indian company and 10 per cent for NRIs/PIOs. FIIs held 18.71 per cent stake in MSI as per the June quarter shareholding pattern.  In another statement, RBI notified that FIIs can now purchase equity shares and convertible debentures of Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd through primary market and stock exchanges under the Portfolio Investment Scheme.

ET

Moody's downgrade not a downgrade per se: SBI Chairman


According to chairman Pratip Chaudhuri, the downgrade is not a downgrade per se. "It is a downgrade of a small segment of the bank's debt," he clarified adding, "SBI's overall rating is still a notch above the sovereign."


Read..........