Reserve Bank of India Deputy Governor Shyamala Gopinath cautioned that while non-interest income did offer diversification benefits, it might not necessarily be less risky than conventional loans. Apart from the financial risks, there were significant reputational risks, particularly when banks engage in distribution of third party products.
“There cannot be rule based prescriptions in this regard. But it would be imperative for the bank boards to closely understand the underlying risks, assess whether returns are commensurate with the risks and monitor such businesses of banks. For the market discipline to work,increased, granular disclosures of fee based income may have to be looked into,'' said Gopinath while inaugurating 12th FIMMDA-PDAI Annual Conference last week. Gopinath further explained that regulatory prescriptions had not recognised the concept of ‘risk as a fungible commodity” and the fundamental distinction between banks taking credit exposure through giving loans and investing in bonds had not been lost. “There are stipulations capping banks’ investments in corporate bonds, particularly unrated bonds which are nothing but proxy-loans. Recently, a limited relaxation from these norms has been permitted in the case of bonds issued by companies engaged in infrastructure development,'' said Gopinath. On developing a corporate bond market Gopinath said that in India in spite of persistent policy focus, this was one area where the outcomes had been less than satisfactory. “The intractable issues pertain to the structural elements relating to the lack of appetite for credit risk among nonbank institutional investors. The issuances have therefore been largely restricted to financial institutions and public sector entities,'' said Gopinath. However, Gopinath clarified that in India, the bank balance sheets are relatively less aligned with capital market – both on the asset side as well as liability side. Capital in the form of subordinate debt and other non-equity instruments constitutes only around 38% of total capital. Issuance of such instruments is restricted by the limit on non-equity elements of regulatory capital.