
Last year, Dr Subbarao had, in media interactions, indicated that he was not keen to continue beyond September, 2013. But no RBI Governor in the past also has given out his mind about his expectations about further extension of tenure especially after the ‘normal’ 5 years term. Assuming he will not press for being relieved, politically and from a mere expediency angle, certain factors are in favour of giving a one year extension to Dr Subbarao. With 2014 Elections round the corner, experimenting with a new face at Mint Road, howsoever ‘faithful’ to North Block s/he may be, will be a risk GOI should better avoid. For the new incumbent also, it will save a lot of ‘adjustments’, if s/he takes over post-2014 Elections. My plea is in the interest of continuity at the top. RBI has seen the way in which postings of Rakesh Mohan and Gokarn(to name just two) were handled in certain circumstances. Across government, public sector and private sector, it is high time GOI gave serious thought about succession plans at the top. In SBI, out of top 72 executives at the highest level 60 will retire before March 31, 2015, according to one media report. Several institutions are headless wonders. Personally, my view is that, as stated here appointments to posts like Governor, RBI should be for a minimum period of 5 years, with provision for reappointment for a further equal term. Retirement age has become a joke, with average age of ‘decision makers’ crossing 65.
- M.G.Warrier
It is very unlikely that any extension would be granted to Shri Subba Rao. Shri Subba Rao would not also accept it in the unlikely event of such an offer being made to him as he is a man of great principles and integrity and would want people to know that he had seriously meant what he had told the Government that he is not interested in any further extension. He would perhaps go down in the History of RBI as the only Governor who had made his intention of not wanting any further extension clear even at the beginning of the first extension of tenure which made his tenure for 5 years which should have been the tenure even in the first instance.
- A. Chandramouliswaran