Saturday, December 1, 2012

FM’s pushing too hard

.....Not too long ago, nineteen Regional Rural Banks were merged into eight entities without consulting the RBI. The FM’s defended its action with the view that the RRB Act of 1976 did not specify any such consultation. But the Act does mention that the RBI will represent the central government on the boards of the RRBs. So in fact, the RBI, along with the NABARD and State governments, does have a role to play in the destinies of the RRBs; all the more so when the health of the sponsoring banks being asked to merge the smaller entities falls under the purview of the central bank. The dangers implicit in the impatience of the FM with the RBI’s dogged insistence on its obligations to future depositors and clientele of the new banks can hardly be overstressed. Asking the central bank to work on faith rather than fiduciary principles, on personal guarantees rather than legislated ones could push a fragile banking system already burdened with stressed assets into systemic risk-prone zones. Perhaps, the RBI will agree and begin the norm-setting effort; but in doing so, it would be acting against its better instincts and its history as one of the most efficient regulators in the world........

2 comments:

www.warriersblog.com said...

An excellent article. As things stand now, future historians of RBI may have to revisit the observation “Perhaps, the RBI will agree and begin the norm-setting effort; but in doing so, it would be acting against its better instincts and its history as one of the most efficient regulators in the world.” appearing in this article again and again! In August 2010, when the discussion paper on new banks was released, I had commented:
“… the issues raised in the paper go much beyond the government’s intention to give a greater role for private sector in banking to promote financial inclusion and reduce government’s financial commitments for running banks. It is quite natural that as a regulatory body responsible for the health of the financial sector, RBI’s concerns go farther from just the net worth of the promoter or his professional capability to run a bank. RBI’s intention to …….. keep the business of banking trustworthy is evident from the issues raised in the discussion paper.”

Ashok Kumar Bhargava said...

Government and the Bank (RBI) have different agenda- Former views every thing from political angle-their prime concern is their vote bank. Whereas RBI is concerned with Economy of the country, stability in the financial sector and many more things as per the Act.
When European Crises was at the peak and prior to that during the South Asian Crisis, it was RBI which insulated us, to a great extent, from the crises. This was acknowledged world over. Perhaps our politicians don't have faith in the Institution that is why slowly they are hitting on its autonomy, not consulting it and doing the things the way it suits them.
God only can save us.