..............In rejoinders and draft amendments to their petition filed with the Bombay High Court today, the Kapur family has said "defendant numbers 7 (Nanda) and 9 (Srinivasan) do not meet the fit and proper requirement of age criteria of 35 to 65 years, as prescribed by the RBI circulars being relied upon...Both defendant numbers 7 and 9 as per the AGM (annual general meeting) notice are 69 years old."............
The very purpose of VITALINFO is to provide a platform for wider dissemination of updated information related to and happening of events in and around RBI.
No comments:
Post a Comment