New Delhi: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is likely to allow domestic banks to participate in the proposed infrastructure debt funds as sponsors through their mutual fund arms. The central bank's move is in the backdrop of series of consultations which the finance ministry has held with it on this subject. The ministry is also in discussions with market regulator Sebi and insurance regulator IRDA on the issue. A finance ministry official told FE that RBI had agreed to allow banks to be strategic sponsors of infrastructure debt funds through their mutual funds arms. Leading banks such as State Bank of India, ICICI and Bank of India have mutual fund arms through which infrastructure projects can be financed. The government is struggling to find long-term funds for infrastructure development, as banks cannot be exposed to the sector beyond a prudent limit. The maturity of bank deposits ranges from three to five years. Providing long-term loans from these medium-term funds creates a serious asset-liability mismatch for the banks. Experts believe that since the debt market in the country is not fully established, domestic banks remain the primary source of funds for these projects. Exploring options like making available bank funds through asset management companies and mutual fund arms will be beneficial for the cash starved infrastructure projects. “ The concept of extending line of funding through the mutual fund arm over and above the funding provided by banks on a project-to-project basis will be beneficial for the infrastructure sector. On the debt side, banks are the main source of finding apart from IDFC, IIFCL etc. Some of the banks have already crossed the sectoral cap for financing infrastructure projects. Financing through the mutual fund arm will compensate poor debt financing options available in the country,” said Sushi Shyamal, partner, infrastructure sector, Ernst & Young. Inadequate funding to the infrastructure funding has delayed the development of the sector. Under current regulations, Indian pension and insurance companies cannot invest directly in infrastructure projects, limiting a crucial source of finding. In the current Five-Year Plan that runs till March 31, 2012, such funds are likely to contribute less than 7% to total investment in projects. The finance ministry, along with the regulators, has been discussing whether the debt fund should take the form of a company or trust. The ministry will prepare the framework for both the structures and then let the promoters choose the model. It is expected that the debt fund as a company would raise funds through issuance of bonds. These could also be dollar denominated bonds. An official said, “It has been decided that maturity of these bonds will be 5-7 years.” The trust could raise money through tradeable financial instruments. The proposed debt funds can only be formed by an India registered company and the lead sponsors of the fund should be Indian. The fund can seek foreign investment from foreign pension and insurance funds through the external commercial borrowing route or foreign institutional investment route. The finance ministry has sought relaxation in the exposure limit and capital adequacy norms from the banking regulator for the proposed infrastructure debt fund, a senior official told FE. The modalities of the fund are expected to be finalised by June-end. Relaxation in exposure limit and capital adequacy norms would enable the debt fund to finance larger number of projects needing bigger funding. Under the RBI guidelines, an infrastructure finance company (IFC) can lend up to 25% of its net own funds to a single borrower and 40% to single group borrowers. “Our aim is to encourage maximum number of projects, so we are seeking relaxation in the exposure limits,” the official said. With regard to capital adequacy or Capital to Risk Asset Ratio (CRAR), RBI guidelines stipulate that NBFCs maintain 15% CRAR with a minimum Tier I capital of 10%.
FE