Wednesday, June 22, 2011

She’s called Simply Great


Signing off as Deputy Governor of RBI, Gopinath tells Shobhana Subramanian how she came to join the central bank instead of Central Bank

Her nickname in RBI is ‘Simply Great’. After all, it was she who held the Indian economy together when Lehman Brothers collapsed in September 2008, making sure Indian banks weren’t cash-strapped. Even earlier, way back in 1991, she helped handle a foreign currency shortage by crystallising the foreign currency liabilities of IOC so that the oil major could honour its payments. If RBI is held in high esteem by governments across the world for having regulated with prudence and pragmatism, much of the credit belongs to Shyamala Gopinath. Indeed, at the end of an illustrious career, one is glad she signed on with the central bank and not Central Bank, from whom she had an offer. As all her colleagues will tell you, the mild-mannered Gopinath is so generous she would make you believe you’re the one who came up with the bright idea, even though in reality the solution would be hers and you might not have a clue about what you’re saying. Having spent a lifetime at RBI, the last few years as deputy governor, Gopinath tells FE she wants to remain gainfully employed, perhaps working with corporates on governance issues. And also learn some classical and devotional music, which she enjoys so much. It’s a Sunday morning and we’re at the RBI guesthouse on Nepean Sea Road in south Mumbai. Although it’s her last Sunday as a deputy governor with RBI, the workaholic in her doesn’t mind that she has a packed schedule. In any case, she says most Sundays are spent catching up with work or reading up on subjects related to what she’s working on, with little time really left to do the household chores. If she does find some time on her hands, she picks up a book; right now she’s engrossed in Ori Brafman’s Sway: The Irresistible Pull of Irrational Behavior. She tells me of how The Washington Post carried out an experiment to judge whether people really understood and recognised talent or whether it was more herd mentality and snob value. The Post asked musician Joshua to play on a Stradivarius in a New York subway but although the music was sublime, he was largely ignored and some even threw a few coins his way. When the same musician played in Boston, tickets were sold out at $100 each. It’s understandable that Gopinath would empathise with the story because she’s as simple it gets, wearing her achievements ever so lightly. We’re served some light fluffy upma and some poha. Gopinath tells me she’s a breakfast person, making sure that she gets something to eat in the mornings before rushing off to work, though she doesn’t really get to spend too much time in the kitchen. Of course, when her daughters are home from the US, she makes sure they get some of the traditional south Indian fare that they miss. Gopinath confides that, of late, her daughters have been complaining that her bisi bele bhath isn’t quite what it used to be. “My daughter says I’ve forgotten how to cook. I must have messed up a little bit.” Although from Karnataka, Gopinath is pretty much a Mumbaikar, having gone to Fatima High School in Ghatkopar, recalling how the institution was just being set up and how classes were added so that she pretty much grew up with the school. The family moved back to Bangalore after a couple of years in Jaipur where Gopinath pursued a degree in commerce. “You could call it incidental or accidental that I studied commerce. The way it happened was that I had to join the university and my father went to fill out the forms. The combinations of subjects available were geography, economics and commerce or history, economics and politics. My father thought I didn’t like history or politics so he enrolled me for commerce, though actually I had wanted to do science.” Gopinath recalls how there were hardly any girls in the commerce stream. “There were four or five sections and hundreds of boys and we were just four girls.” However, she was interested in banking and had been selected by both Bank of Baroda and Central Bank of India. But her father insisted she take the RBI entrance examination, which, in those days, was held in Chennai. “In those days, the application fee was R50 and I thought it was high. I felt it would be too much of expense because someone would have to accompany me to Chennai.” But her father, who she says was “overawed by RBI”, persuaded her to take the examination that she topped. Gopinath said she didn’t even know that she belonged to the first batch of Grade-B officers and what it meant to be one. “RBI at the time was only recruiting Grade-A officers. She recalls a letter from Bank of Baroda when she didn’t take up their offer. “Please think twice. Why do you want to join RBI? There’s hardly any expansion there while we are going to open hundreds of branches.” Gopinath says she doesn’t really regret joining RBI. But now that she’s no longer going to be a central banker, would she like to take some pace off her schedule? “Unfortunately I didn’t learn classical music, that’s something I must find time for,” she says, adding that her Mumbai upbringing has made her fond of film music and ghazals. But for someone who works 24/7, it can’t be all leisure. “I’m committed to regulatory practices and want to continue learning and applying what I have learnt, so I would not mind being involved with corporates and helping them evolve governance.” Since she has been on the board of SBI, I ask whether she was somewhat disappointed with its governance. Gopinath points out that it is hard to understand public sector governance because while SBI is listed, the governance structure is in the SBI Act. That means the role of the shareholders is not what it is in the case of other listed companies. Moreover, it’s not the board but the government that makes the appointments. “I’m not saying it hasn’t worked but in the case of private sector banks we have tried to separate the chairman from the managing directors whereas in PSBs we have CMDs. We have tried to understand this difference but perhaps because the government is the owner there are certain boundaries within which the board functions, so may be one doesn’t need this kind of separation. But we do need to think about this,” she says. Wasn’t RBI miffed with the SBI management because it took some decisions without the knowledge of the board? Gopinath downplays the issue. “During the crisis, corporates needed money and we were not upset with the decisions. There was just the one matter relating to the Tata bonds where they had interpreted the circular differently but it was an off-balance-sheet transaction, not a loan.” Will the holding company structure make it easier for RBI to regulate corporates that may run banks? Gopinath believes that one lesson she learnt from the financial crisis is that no model came out as being the best model and the crisis was actually model-neutral. She concludes, therefore, that eventually the success of any model depends on the regulatory environment and the intensity of supervision. “What the holding company does is encourage transparency and makes the structure less complex so that one clearly knows the inter-connections and liabilities,” she explains, adding that “whether the arm’s length piece can be dealt with better, that is another question”. Is India far away from full convertibility on the capital account? “Of late, I’ve been wondering what exactly is full convertibility and I would like to see a country where there is full convertibility on the capital account,” says Gopinath, who points out that the current framework has been liberalised to the extent needed for the economy to grow with stability. “Corporates today have a fair amount of freedom but perhaps not individuals. That’s because remittances tend to be pro-cyclical and the pro-cyclicality gets accentuated when individuals are given more freedom,” she explains. We can’t be oblivious to the financial stability implications of capital flows, she asserts. Does she see the renminbi becoming the reserve currency in the near future? Clearly, as of now, the dollar is the reserve currency, though the Chinese do have the capacity to experiment because their reserves are so large, she explains, also pointing out pertinently that China is using the Hong Kong route to liberalising. “The renminbi can become the reserve currency if it becomes truly convertible, which is not the case now,” she says. The coffee arrives and after a few sips we have to conclude our conversation because, you guessed it, Gopinath has to rush for an appointment.
FE

Taking stock: Pranab to meet bank chiefs on July 8

Finance minister Pranab Mukherjee will meet the chiefs of public sector banks on July 8 to take stock of the current environment of high lending rates, which is hampering the credit need of the industry and threatening to slow down economic growth.  Though the official agenda of the meeting is likely to be reviewing the performance of banks last year and examining the plans for this year, bankers said since the macroeconomic scenario had significantly changed since the beginning of the current financial year, the ministry would review the present situation as well. Most of the banks are yet to receive a detailed agenda of the meeting. They have, however, been informed about the meeting by the finance ministry. The growth in loans during the April-June period was significantly lower at around Rs 42,000 crore, compared to Rs 1.23 lakh crore during the same period of the previous financial year. This was owing to a sharp increase in the lending rates, following successive increases in policy rates. While the base rate of banks rose 200-250 basis points (bps) since July last year, the repo rate rose 250 bps since March 2010. On an annual basis, credit growth moderated from 21.3 per cent in March to 20.6 per cent in early June, but remained above the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) indicative projection of 19 per cent for 2011-12. The central bank had increased the policy rates 10 times in the last 15 months to tackle inflation. However, since inflation is still high, analysts and economists expect RBI to continue with the rate increase cycle. Government-owned banks are now in discussions with finance ministry officials to finalise the statement of intent for 2011-12. The statement of intent is a document through which banks indicate their target for the year on various parameters like credit growth, low cost-deposit growth, net interest margins and financial inclusion plans.
BS

RBI’s unanswerable 29 questions and lessons for merchant bankers

.........If RBI’s goal is to prevent mis-selling by banks, possibly the information collection could begin with focusing on the big potatoes rather than ask for wall-to-wall information that will finally serve no purpose..........

Click to read.......

A primitive drug with many side effects : Subir Roy

For over a year now the Reserve Bank of India has been engaged in monetary tightening to contain inflation. While that remains stubbornly high, there is a clear deceleration in the growth rate, putting paid to hopes of starting off the next plan on the elevated path of 9 per cent growth. The inflation and lower growth are being cited together as symptoms of all not being well with the Indian economy, which has been a star performer in recent years. A clear distinction is not being made between the two – inflation and lower growth – even though the former is the disease and the latter a side effect of the medicine used to fight it. In fact, there is not much sign of satisfaction that the policy rate instrument is working quite effectively, doing what it was supposed to do – suppress demand. The fact that the ultimate aim of tightening, sharply bringing down the inflation rate, has not yet been achieved has not raised doubts about the efficacy of the medicine. Over time it will achieve the desired effect, but possibly at great cost. The initial impact on consumer demand and sentiment will translate into a downswing in business sentiment, resulting in a cutback in investment expenditure (gross fixed capital formation has begun displaying negative signals). If this consolidates, it will slow down growth for several years as had happened after the tightening of 1996. The finance minister has already expressed the first sign of worry: if the slowdown becomes pronounced, it will affect revenue buoyancy, render awry his fiscal projections and raise a question mark over future fiscal stability. With a slowdown in capacity creation, the export surplus may diminish, affecting the current buoyancy in exports. All this will have the most negative of social consequences — job growth will suffer and with it the battle against poverty. With so much at stake, it is necessary to re-examine the basic tenets of the anti-inflationary regime that is being followed. Even if there isn’t much scope for change, a detailed look can help clarify priorities — what are the goals and what is the price that can be paid to achieve them? The root of the present inflationary episode is threefold: the rural employment guarantee programme since 2006 imparting a sharp rise in demand for food, the drought of 2009 impacting food output and the rise in global oil prices through 2010, accompanied by a hardening of commodity prices. The rise in the fiscal deficit through 2008-2010 is not seen as inflationary since it owes its origins to the stimulus imparted to counter the global slowdown in the wake of the financial crisis, and insulate the Indian economy from its consequences. As food inflation lies at the core of the present inflation and the employment programme is likely to sustain a high demand for food, the key to tackling the supply-induced part of inflation surely lies in vastly improving agricultural management. Policy failure on this front is the starkest but the positive side is that the list of things that need to be done is both obvious and widely understood. Improved water management leading to better drought-proofing, shifting the thrust of procurement to coarse cereals and rain-fed areas, taking forward the reform in fertiliser prices to restore soil nutrition and storing grain better so that rodents don’t get to it — all this is doable at short notice with a likely quick positive impact on supply. The other area where immediate action is possible is countering what goes under the broad rubric of fiscal profligacy and particularly cutting energy subsidy. The positive impact will be twofold: non-productive current expenditure will be partly reined in and by pricing energy right the correct incentive and signal will be transmitted to raise energy efficiency. Additional gains can be reducing the incentive for diversion of kerosene, driving the oil mafia out of business and removing the perversity of subsidising diesel-powered luxury cars. But for many the need to contain fiscal profligacy also includes arguing against the employment guarantee programme and the right to food security and education. If a job creation scheme is used to construct public assets like tanks, irrigation bundhs and rural roads, and public transfers lead to undernourished poor people being better fed and receiving a minimum of education, then the picture changes. India’s inability to create large numbers of low-skilled manufacturing jobs is rightly laid at the door of its inflexible labour markets. But it is forgotten that countries like Japan, Korea and China all followed the route, now being adopted by Vietnam, which gave them well-fed, healthy and educated workers before the jobs came. So, having a clear idea of what is wasteful non-productive public expenditure is vital to attain the right policy mix. All the foregoing actions should take precedence over that favoured policy instrument of monetarists — raising interest rates. When inflation is caused by a shortage of essentials, or when it results from policy intervention for public transfers to empower the poor, raising interest rates is foolhardy. It ends up extending investment horizons and adding to manufacturing costs. It is like a doctor prescribing a primitive first-generation drug with many side effects. It is necessary to live with some inflation, that which is caused by a net transfer to the poor which eventually leads to a more productive workforce. The simplistic mantra – inflation sighted, ergo raise interest rates – needs to be countered.
BS

Visa & MasterCard gone. Rupay card, bring it on

Finally it's here! The much talked about India card which will replace global payment players MasterCard and Visa in India. CNBC-TV18's Gopika Gopakumar finds out more about the Rupay Cards. It may not be long before the logos of Visa and MasterCard disappear from your plastic cards. Instead these will be replaced by an Indian name Rupay. This is the new card payment scheme launched by the National Payment Corporation of India, a company started three years back by 10 banks, to oversee all retail payment systems in India. Currently, all card payments are routed through Visa or Mastercard which process these transactions outside the country, but this may not be the case in the future. "There should be something domestic. Payment information is very sensitive. So there has to be repository of payment information with some institution. Why should banks in India pay such high fee to MasterCard or Visa," AP Hota, CEO, National Payments Corporation of India said. Currently, banks pay around Rs 300 crore every year to Visa and MasterCard for processing all debit and credit card payments. NPCI says Rupay will reduce the cost for both banks and customers. "We believe that it's possible to reduce the processing fee that banks pay to MasteraCard and Visa by half if not more. Rupay will be aiming at reducing the cost for the bank," Hota added. Bankers too feel Rupay will be a viable option. Alok Mishra, CMD, Bank of India , said, “It is indigenous and will be cheaper. Most people here don't travel abroad nor do they need settlement for Visa, MasterCard. What they require is a settlement here. And I think Rupay will work for them.” To begin with it focuses on tying up with 82 regional rural banks and 100 urban cooperative banks. Having issued 10,000 debit cards, it now plans to scale up by issuing Aadhar-enabled financial inclusion cards. NPCI says it will be a while before the commercial banks start issuing Rupay debit cards as most of them already have tie-ups with global players. Besides, the regulator favours competition in this segment and so unlike the Chinese, may not make it mandatory.


Click here to watch the video......

Near-inverted yield curve shows RBI almost at end of rate cycle

..............while the local inverted yield curve points directionally to a slowdown, what it probably means is that the bond markets are signalling that RBI is near the end of its tightening cycle..........
Click to read.............

Foreign funds shy away from India’s realty

Mumbai: With the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) frowning on structured products and the government stipulating a three-year lock-in period, foreign direct investment (FDI) in real estate has slowed down significantly over the past year. Industry-watchers point out that after the Lehman crisis, investors have turned more cautious and capital flows into Indian real estate have tapered off.  While FDI flows amounted to roughly $14-15 billion in the four years to December 2009, just about a billion had come in till November last year. Regulations apart, poor project execution leading to losses for some investors has made them far more circumspect, especially in a hostile macroeconomic environment
FE

It is Best to leave Debt Management to RBI – R.K.PATTNAIK

There has been some debate in the past on the separation of debt management from the Reserve Bank of India in the Indian context. A perusal of the debate revealed that in the RBI itself there were differences of opinion. Nevertheless, the recent statement of the RBI governor against the separation is praiseworthy, particularly in the context of the proposal in the Union Budget 2011-12 to introduce the Public Debt Management Agency Bill. The ministry of finance (MoF) of the government of India (GoI) should consider revisiting the whole issue in the light of the governor’s public statement as, globally, there is a wide recognition that debt management is no longer a routine exercise. For prudent fiscal, monetary and debt management, it is advisable that debt management should continue with the RBI. The separation of debt management from RBI will not be helpful; it will have an adverse impact on the market. First, in the dynamic environment created by the introduction of the Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF) in 2000 and the prohibition on RBI’s participation in the primary market under the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act, 2003, the primary market interest rates, which are auction-driven, are no longer viewed as interest rate signaling by the RBI. Therefore, the conventional argument that there is conflict of interest does not have much validity. Furthermore, the cost of government borrowings is inextricably linked to the level of fiscal deficit rather than the arrangement for debt management by the central bank.  Secondly, independent management and issuance of government debt could distort the sovereign yield curve in a thin market, jeopardising the monetary signaling and its transmission across the yield curve.  Thirdly, a likely outcome of the separation could be the emergence of multiple debt management agencies, viz one for the state governments’ market borrowings and another for the central government borrowings. What will happen to the public debt offices of the RBI? In such a scenario, coordination among debt managers will be difficult and will eventually lead to conflict and confusion. Fourthly, evidence suggests that the smooth conduct of the government’s large borrowing programme has been facilitated because the RBI, apart from the banker and debt manager to the government, also has broad range of responsibilities, including regulations and surveillance of financial institutions, financial markets and market infrastructure. Thus, the RBI successfully manages the government borrowing programme with its apt knowledge and vast experience in studying market liquidity, investors’ appetite and risk constraints, apart from timing of debt issuance in line with its avowed objective of maintaining financial stability.  Fifth, evidence suggests that the cash management of the government has remained poor and inefficient. The RBI, as banker and debt manager, has been helpful in accommodating the deficit and surplus mode, taking into account the absorptive capacity of the market. One doubts if an independent body will have such experience to handle cash management of such magnitude and varying degree.  Sixth, in the post-crisis environment globally, there has been a rethinking that debt management is again becoming a critical element in the overall conduct for financial stability as events in Greece have shown. Studies undertaken by multilateral agencies like the World Bank, IMF and BIS said there is a merit in leaving debt management to central banks. The BIS study (November 2010) particularly noted that debt management can no longer be viewed as a routine function that can be delegated to a separate, independent body. Instead, such management lies at the crossroads between monetary and fiscal policy. The study further opined that during difficult times, government securities market conditions are better managed by the central banks. In view of this, the study recommended that the central banks should be encouraged to revert to their role of managing national debt. Seventh, the recent handling of the market borrowing programme by the RBI in a non-disruptive manner in its capacity as debt manager and monetary authority clearly indicates that there exists a strong confluence of interest in debt and monetary management, contrary to the conventional view that there is a conflict of interest.  In view of the above factors, it is imperative that debt management continues with the RBI. The Middle Office that has been set up within the MoF may be further strengthened to coordinate and provide technical and analytical input to the cash and debt management committee. The Centre may reconsider the introduction of the Bill on Public Debt Management Agency with an emphasis on separation of debt management from the RBI.
The author is professor of economics at KJ Somaiya Institute of Management Studies and Research, Mumbai
ET

Risk in policy debates


Former RBI Governor Y.V. Reddy began the discussion in the 11 June issue of Economic and Political Weekly. He was commenting on an article by Planning Commission deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia, on the prospects and policy challenges in the 12th Plan. Reddy complained that the Plan does not discuss the “risks to the economy and economic agents”.......
Read.............

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

RBI Deputy Governor Shyamala Gopinath retires




“There have been many testing periods during my career at the central bank. But I always enjoyed such situations, because our responsibility is to ensure that the public confidence in the system is not shaken,” RBI Deputy Governor Shyamala Gopinath said
Mumbai: The Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Shyamala Gopinath, who retired today from the Mint Road office after 39 years of service, says she never felt that she was disadvantaged or advantaged for being a woman, and that there is no glass ceiling at the central bank, reports PTI. “I don't think a glass ceiling operates for the Governor (of the RBI) or for that matter, for any of its officers. At the RBI, all officers are treated as officers and not as women or men. I am an RBI officer like any other. Because of one’s gender one would not be able to climb up the ladder here,” Ms Gopinath told PTI in her last interview as the Deputy Governor here yesterday. “In my 39 years of life at RBI, never ever I felt that I should be treated differently for being a woman. Being women does not help or places one at a disadvantageous position at RBI,” she explained. When asked about the highs and lows of her four decades-old career, Ms Gopinath said she enjoyed managing many a crisis situation during her long years of service. “There have been many testing periods during my career at the central bank. But I always enjoyed such situations, because our responsibility is to ensure that the public confidence in the system is not shaken,” Ms Gopinath who joined RBI in April 1972, says adding since she has handled so many areas, does not feel that she has spent so many years. Elaborating on the tough tasks that RBI has to handle, she says government borrowing is always a tough job, especially during a crisis. “See, managing liquidity is a big challenge. Managing government borrowing means ensuring that the confidence in the system is not shaken and also ensuring that there is enough liquidity in the system.” During the last crisis even the economy itself was in bad shape. So were the banks, with very low credit offtake. Therefore, liquidity management was the biggest challenge for us, she recalls and reels out the list of serious crises as the Asian currency meltdown of 1997, the Kargil conflict of 1999, the Harshad Mehta stock scam of 1992, and ensuring liquidity during the India Millennium Bond maturity of 2000. Ms Gopinath, who loves classical music, says she wants to give some time to herself before starting anything new. But she would like to continue to contribute to public policy and the financial sector one way or other. During the interim, Ms Gopinath, who said she does not have any particular hobbies, would like to listen to and learn some classical music. Haling from Karnataka, Ms Gopinath has been handling the departments of internal debt management, foreign exchange, government and bank accounts, non-banking supervision, external investments and operations, financial markets, communication and legal, at the time of hanging up her boots. Appointed as deputy governor on 20 September 2004 for five years, Ms Gopinath was given an extension till 20 June 2011. Significantly, her previous colleague Usha Thorat was denied an extension after her five-year stint that ended on 4 November 2010, which raised many eyebrows. And so was the fate of V.Leeladhar who was appointed on the same day along with Gopinath in 2004.
Moneylife

Q&A: Shyamala Gopinath, Deputy Governor, RBI



Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Deputy Governor Shyamala Gopinath retired on Monday after 39 years of service at the central bank. In an interview with Parnika Sokhi and Manojit Saha, she talks about the journey
You were one of the longest serving Deputy Governors. How was the journey?
I had the opportunity to deal with several aspects of RBI's functions. Central banking is handled differently in different countries. Some of them are monetary authorities, while some have multiple roles, like we do. The very diversity of RBI's roles provides a huge opportunity. At the same time, there is a kind of a linkage. I was on the regulation side, and then on the market area. It gives a good sense on how you regulate the market.
You have seen several upturns and downturns, the recent one being in 2008. What is your suggestion to future central bankers?
The main lesson is not to be afraid of taking any action. If we feel there are certain conditions in the market which could lead to problems, one should be able take certain unpopular steps.
In the financial stability report released last week, RBI expressed concern on the ability of Indian firms to refinance foreign currency convertible bonds (FCCBs). What led to the concern?
We have flagged the issue for a couple of reasons. One is FCCBs were seen as a wonder instrument for all corporates. Companies were able to raise almost zero interest funds, since they were sure they would convert them (FCCBs) into equity. Such was the surety that they made any provision, even for a possible interest liability. So, if the FCCB is redeemed, they have to pay.
We don't think there would be any problem in meeting all the obligations. RBI had earlier enabled companies to refinance FCCBs through extra commercial borrowings. We are in discussions with the government to explore the possibility of making it easier for companies to either refinance or buy back.
So, would there be some leeway for them to tide over the problem?
Yes. But, ultimately, this problem has to be sorted out by the companies. Very often, companies say since the FCCB would be converted into equity, RBI should not have any regulation that applies to debt to be made applicable to an FCCB. However, it is clear now that our policy to treat FCCBs as debt upfront turned out to be the right approach.
Why did RBI change its stance regarding financial stability?
Even when the proposal was mooted, we never said there should not be any co-ordination mechanism. We felt the autonomy of the regulator should be maintained and the role of the central bank in maintaining macro stability and systemic stability should be recognised. During a crisis, if there is a liquidity concern, the central bank has to be there. But if it is a solvency issue, the government has to be there. In that sense, in the time of a crisis, the government has a role and that is what we have recognised.
But RBI still opposes the separation of the debt management office (DMO) from the central bank.
The government is aware of our views and it is for the government to ultimately take a view. But one has to be a little cautious in thinking that a separate DMO would minimise costs, since this cost minimisation can only happen with more risk. Some independent DMOs, which were present in Greece and in Portugal ended up in real crisis. We know what followed then.
What were RBI's apprehensions regarding foreign direct investment (FDI) in proprietary trading?
We need to understand why we need FDI in proprietary trading. What is proprietary trading? You bring in money and you speculate on it. They would bring in certain equity and then borrow from the Indian market and then trade on that. They are no different from hedge funds.
What is your unfinished work at RBI?
I would have liked to see some of it happen before I left the central bank. For example, we introduced the core banking solution for the central bank and we are looking for a new state-of-the-art depository for government bonds. That will happen next year. Credit default swaps (CDS) and interest rate futures are also there. We are looking at resolution of some of the issues. We have some suggestions. So, to take that forward, I hope banks start writing CDS by October-November.
After retirement, Usha Thorat is still associated with the central bank in some form. Would you also like to be around?
I would like to be in the financial sector, by contributing to public policies. However, as of now, I don't have anything on the cards.

BS

There is a lot of satisfaction in contributing to public policy


The RBI has been fortunate to have as Governors persons of great intellect and intellectual integrity, who were also committed to the cause of the common person

Ms Shyamala Gopinath retired on Monday as Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India after nearly a four-decade stint with the central bank. Joining the RBI as a direct recruit officer on probation in April 1972, Ms Gopinath concedes, with a smile, that she did not think she would reach this pinnacle at that time. She has risen through the ranks and handled some of RBI's most critical portfolios, including financial markets, financial regulation, forex reserves, government debt and exchange rate, banking supervision and regulation. Modest and shy, Ms Gopinath has earned great appreciation from peers, market participants as well as the Government. Mr P. Chidamabaram, during his tenure as Finance Minister, praised her deft handling of many crises — especially during the global meltdown in 2008. She met Business Line a day before her successful stint in the RBI came to a close, to share some of the highlights of her career. We may hear more of her post-retirement, as she does plan to be associated in some capacity in the financial sector.
Excerpts from the interview:
As you look back at your career, what has given you the greatest satisfaction?
The greatest satisfaction comes from being active and contributing to policy making in diverse areas. The work schedules did give rise to occasional stresses but I feel some amount of work pressure actually has a positive impact. I must however add that work-related stresses can only be managed if the home front is taken care of — I didn't have to worry about work-life balance because of an understanding and supportive family.
What are your post-retirement plans?
The immediate priority will be to deal with some domestic matters and settle down and get used to a life without the RBI support system. I would certainly like to be connected with the financial sector in one way or the other. I would like to spend some more time with my family. I would like to learn carnatic music — not that I want to become a singer. But if I can pursue it, that will give me a lot of contentment.
Do you have regrets? Would you do anything differently if you had another chance?
If one had a chance, with the benefit of hindsight, one can do things differently. But there is not so much to regret, although I would have liked to have been associated more closely with some of the organisational issues — particularly in the areas of HR, skills management, trying to find the right balance between seniority and merit and issues relating to keeping the staff motivated.  These are issues that I feel concerned about. Then there are certain things I have always felt strongly about — for instance, the simplification of FEMA regulation. Our notifications are so legalistic. That was one thing I wanted to do something about but unfortunately could not. Also, I would have been happier if it was possible to have seen completion of certain things initiated during my tenure.
It has been said that the Governor's job is the loneliest in the country. Does that make the Deputy Governor's job the second loneliest?
The loneliness is reflective of the challenges RBI faces as an institution and the constant public scrutiny of its actions. For the Governor, no doubt, being the most public face of the institution, it is most evident. As Deputy Governors, we have one buffer level. Also, there is a collegial way of handling issues.  For decisions, we can go to DGs' Committee and now there is also an established way of consulting stakeholders, including the technical advisory committees and such other processes. Everybody's views are heard and taken into account.
How was your experience in dealing with different Governors? What are your memories of their working style?
The RBI has been fortunate to have as Governors, persons of great intellect and intellectual integrity who were also committed to the cause of the common person. The Governors (Dr Rangarajan, Dr Jalan, Dr Reddy and Dr Subbarao) have not been dogmatic or wedded to any single ideology. They were their own person. And they had an interest in the welfare of the common man.  I remember Dr Jalan's liberalisation of the forex regulations — all of which were done to ensure that the common man was not put to any undue hassle. At the same time, Dr Jalan used very unorthodox measures to deal with the Asian crisis. The Resurgent India Bond (RIB) and India Millenium Deposit (IMD) were done during his tenure. Apart from that, although he was not from the markets, he had a great sense of judgment when taking decisions on the market operations of the RBI — whether in the government securities market or in the forex market.  And in the forex market, he took decisions without being unduly perturbed about the perceptions and reactions of the market participants. You have to distinguish between those who use forex for business transactions and those who use it simply for trading. He always made that distinction. Dr Reddy is a person of great vision and clarity — again not wedded to ideology. He had strong convictions and was clear about the goals and the outcome. He believed in a non-disruptive way of doing things and ensured it was done that way. He was a very good administrator and during his tenure, every area of the RBI saw some change. And Dr Subbarao... his scientific and engineering background comes out very clearly in his analysis. He has to be convinced with facts when we say something. He is not ideological or dogmatic. He took a lot of steps after the Lehman crisis with foresight and courage.  The decisions that he took then were the right decisions, else we could not have tided over the crisis so easily. Although we had capital controls, regulations, etc., he knew we were not immune to the impact of the global crisis and, therefore, he took certain steps. He brought method to the madness of central banking. He is always in favour of more simplicity, clarity in the way we communicate and has tried to demystify central banking.
What would be your advice to new recruits in the RBI?
My first advice is that they should have an inclination towards public policy. There will be some departments which will have more interesting work in terms of interaction and dialogue with market participants. But there are many other areas of public policy that the RBI is engaged in. And public policy is not just in monetary policy or financial regulation — but also in other developmental areas such as rural credit, rural planning, currency management and the like. One has to be patient and ready to work in different areas of the bank, and will have to do so willingly. It is always helpful if you have experience in a couple of departments before taking up a senior position.  The other aspect is that in organisations such as the RBI, there is a certain path or trajectory for promotions. So you do come within the zone of consideration. Getting promotions is not entirely left to the whims and fancies of your boss.  At the same time, there are some who will feel that this is an inhibiting factor because they think they can progress faster as they are competent. By and large, the RBI is a very good employer. There is a lot of satisfaction because your work contributes to public welfare.  
A committee headed by you had recently recommended that the interest rate on small savings be linked to the yield on government securities. Isn't that unfriendly to the small savers who prefer a certain fixed income?
I am glad you asked this. It does dawn on me that perhaps we didn't make this point absolutely clear in our report. Let me say that interest rate will remain fixed for the full term of the instrument. It is only that at the point the instrument is issued, the rate of interest will be determined by linking it to the average rate of the G-secs during the preceding year.
So, the interest rate on the instrument is fixed for the full term. It is user-friendly. It is not a floating rate. It is not that there would be a change every time there is a change in the g-sec rate.
On the derivatives controversy, what is the RBI's responsibility? Since the banks report their transactions to the RBI, could the problem have been prevented by RBI?
We had liberalised the writing of options way back in 1996. So it is not that the derivatives problem was caused because the RBI allowed something suddenly and the banks landed in problems. The policy has been there since 1996, although it was obviously used only by a few banks and companies, though not on a scale seen later. Now, individual transactions are not reported to us. There is an aggregate position on what options are written. We don't get any information on client rates at all. I doubt if individual transactions get reported in any country except one or two developed markets. We are able to see some of the transactions only at the time of our annual inspection. These derivative transactions happened in April 2007. At that time, we had huge inflows and the rupee was appreciating. And analysts were saying that the rupee would appreciate even more. We had low interest rates overseas — especially on the Japanese Yen and Swiss Franc. So many exporters were attracted to taking cross-currency positions apart from dollar-rupee, and banks structured products combining both. Then the markets changed and the rupee started weakening instead of strengthening further. Now when this happened in 2007-08, we would have come to know about it only in our inspection after March 31, 2008. And there was the global crisis in 2008.  Remember, we had a policy by which banks were required to have board-approved plans of their clients before they got into this. Many companies entered into this because they got some revenues upfront and didn't understand the risks they were taking. Whether banks mis-sold or not, is something to be seen on a case-by-case basis. You can't generalise on this. We are now looking at how to improve reporting of over-the counter (OTC) derivatives — at least in large value transactions. Not small transactions because there are millions of them and it will be difficult to monitor.  Now we have the currency futures market and if anybody wants to take speculative bets, we expect them to go to the futures market. We have tightened the regulations. Now, we have decided to allow the OTC transactions to those who have an underlying commercial transaction and want to reduce the leverage element.
Exporters have complained that at that time the RBI had given the impression that it would protect the rupee, but suddenly let go. What is your response to that?
The one thing that we have always communicated is that we don't target a level of exchange rate, and that it is determined by demand-supply and other factors. We may intervene when there is excess volatility. We have not given any assurance any time. We have now demonstrated that the RBI does not have any preferred level of exchange rate. Smaller exporters should hedge their currency risks and also try to use the futures market.
Your recent regulations (laying down minimum net worth for options) are said to be too tight and hurting smaller players. Your comments.
The trouble is that it is these smaller exporters with lower net worth and turnover who get badly hit when there is exchange rate volatility. They are the ones who say that banks had mis-sold and did not tell them about the risks. In the case of larger companies we have told them to do the valuation based on accounting standards. It is not as if they can enter the derivatives market and not mark-to-market their positions. This helps banks also and the shareholders also know what risks companies are taking. That doesn't happen in small firms. Our stand has been that smaller companies must use simpler products rather than complex ones, because their risk tolerance and appetite is lower.
Hindu

I wasn’t aware of Tata debenture issue

In an interview, Shyamala Gopinath, Deputy Governor of Reserve Bank of India (RBI) spoke about her experience as a director on the State Bank of India (SBI) board.....

Also watch accompanying video...........

Click to explore...............

Gopinath defends SBI profit plunge, counters Deputy Guv Chakrabarty



“If a bank chooses to make a one-time provision, it is their choice and there’s nothing wrong with it. The provisions towards gratuity, pensions and other annuities that SBI made in Q4 could have been staggered,” Gopinath said, adding that the directors have no way to know the individual slippages. These comments are contrary to those of her colleague, KC Chakrabarty. Recently he had gone public about disconcerting trend of state-run banks reporting poor numbers whenever a new chairman comes in...........


Read more............

Nothing wrong with SBI opting for more provisions: Gopinath

MUMBAI: The outgoing Reserve Bank deputy governor, Shyamala Gopinath , has defended higher provisionings that SBI made in the Q4 of FY11 which saw its net plunging 99 per cent, saying it does not call for a change in bank's accounting and reporting standards and that RBI can only ensure that a bank makes all the mandated provisions.  "The accounting or reporting standards of banks cannot change. How can they? If at all there is an issue, it is about the rise in NPAs, and not in other provisions, which SBI made. The Reserve Bank can only ensure that a bank makes all the mandated provisions for all the heads we ask for," Gopinanth, who is on the board of SBI, told PTI in her last interview as the deputy governor here yesterday.  "If a bank chooses to make a one-time provision, it is their choice and there's nothing wrong with it. The provisions towards gratuity, pensions and other annuities that SBI made in Q4 could have been staggered," Gopinath said, adding that the directors have no way to know the individual slippages.  These comments are contrary to those of her colleague, KC Chakrabarty. Recently he had gone public about disconcerting trend of state-run banks reporting poor numbers whenever a new chairman comes in.  "See our banks, I see when the chairman retires the profit goes down. Books should not be as per the minds of the chairman, but reporting should be as per books," he had said.  "The point is that irrespective of the fact who is the chairman, those provisions are to be made one quarter or other. So it is not about typically flouting norms, but about timing the provisioning," Gopinath argued. She further said, "SBI's Rs 500-crore teaser loan provision was one-time and was mandated, but the rest all, barring those for new NPAs, could have been staggered. If at all previous chairman OP Bhatt had remained in office, he too would have made these provisions."

ET

RBI may demand data on unhedged positions of firms

Banks told to look for loans not guaranteed before giving credit

The Reserve Bank of India is planning to ask companies to declare unhe­dged positions while raising foreign debt. RBI has also asked banks to check the portion of loans that are not guaranteed while examining the creditworthiness of a company before sanctioning a loan. RBI Deputy Governor Shyamala Gopinath told Financial Chronicle on her last day in office that the central bank would closely monitor overseas exposures of companies by asking them to declare unhedged positions while going for external commercial borrowing (ECB). The central bank has also set up a committee headed by former deputy governor Usha Thorat to track the audit trail of bank credit. Ananth Narayan, managing director and regional head of fixed income and currency trading in South Asia at Standard Chartered Bank, said the risk the company runs depends on overall borrowing and not just one loan alone. “However, it is important for the regulator to make a distinction between these two kinds of NBFCs and support the NBFCs that support financial inclusion in rural areas,” said Gopinath.
http://www.mydigitalfc.com/news/rbi-may-demand-data-unhedged-positions-firms-170

Cost of funds increased even before rate hike: Chanda Kochhar, ICICI Bank

To some extent the cost of funds has already started going up even before the announcement of this rate hike. So as clearly one sees more impact on cost of funds, I think you will see that....


Continue reading..............

Kotak Mahindra plans maiden branch in Singapore

Kotak Mahindra Bank plans to open its maiden overseas branch in Singapore and has applied for a licence to the RBI, a senior official said on Monday. "We have applied for an international branch to the RBI (Reserve Bank of India). We would like to set up our first branch in Singapore," C Jayaram, executive director of Kotak Mahindra Bank told Reuters, but declined to give a time frame. After the bank obtains the RBI nod, it will have to get an approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore, he said. The private lender is also planning to expand its branch network in India, Jayaram said. "We have a branch expansion plan, for which I think we are in the last stage of getting permission from the Reserve Bank of India."  The bank will have more than 500 branches by April 2013, compared with 321 branches as on March 31, Jayaram said.
BS

'RBI to pause hikes if core inflation stabilizes'

Mumbai: The Reserve Bank of India will pause its rate tightening cycle if non-food manufacturing inflation stabilises, a deputy governor of the RBI was quoted as saying by a business newspaper. Subir Gokarn was speaking to television channel at a Banker's Trust programme, the paper said. The paper also reported Gokarn as saying the number and overall magnitude of rate increases have a bearing on both inflation activity and inflation expectations, and the RBI expects that over time its rate hikes will lower inflation. Since March 2010, the RBI has raised key interest rate 10 times, by a total of 275 basis points, to rein in stubbornly high inflation. "Slower growth is something we accept as a price of managing inflation, but we don't expect that slowdown to be dramatic," Gokarn said in the interview. "We expect that growth will move from 8.5 percent of last year to 8 percent this year but, along with that, inflation will come down down from 9 percent to 6 percent by the end of the (fiscal) year assuming that no new shocks are to appear." Gokarn also said the interest rate was in a zone where it was possible for the RBI to reverse the policy "fairly quickly" if the circumstances demand. "Our readings of financial performance do not suggest that (the impact of higher rates) is broad-based yet, (but) it may become and that's a possibility that we have accommodated because one of the factors against a 50 (bps hike) this time is that the slowdown we anticipated may gain some momentum," he said. The RBI is expected to raise its policy rate by a total of 75 basis points for the rest of 2011, including the 25 basis point increase last Thursday, unchanged from forecasts in a May 3 poll, a poll found.

Zee News

Inflation to remain high for some more time: Rangarajan

Ahmedabad: The Chairman of Economic Advisory Council to PM, Dr C Rangarajan, today said that overall inflation would remain at a high level for some more time, but as the monsoon progresses the food inflation will come down. "The inflation would remain at a high level for some more time but as the monsoon progresses the food inflation will come down and I expect the overall inflation to come down to 6.5 per cent level by March 2012," Rangarajan told PTI, on the sidelines of a book launch event at IIM-A. Replying to a query on further possibility of tightening the interest rates, Rangarajan said, "If inflation continues to persist at the high level, I think the Reserve Bank of India will continue with the policy of tightening." On being asked that RBI has already stated that it is not solely responsible for taming inflation and other stakeholders should pitch in to curb it, Rangarajan said, "As far as the government is concerned the role is two-fold." "One (is) to keep the fiscal deficit low so that it does not adds to demand pressures. The Union Finance Minister has made it very clear that during the current year that the fiscal deficit will be maintained at the budgeted levels of 4.6 per cent of the GDP," Rangarajan said. "Second is the role of the government in terms of intervention in the food grains market. Now this was done very effectively last year with a result now that year-on-year increase in cereal prices is very low, it is not more than an increase 2-3 per cent," he said. "In the case of pulses, the year-on-year inflation is negative. But in the case of other food articles the prices have risen, there the intervention by the government in terms of releasing of the stocks is not possible," Rangarajan said.
IBN Live

Govt appoints three independent directors on ONGC board, clears way for FPO


NEW DELHI: The government has appointed three independent directors on the board of Oil and Natural Gas Corp (ONGC), paving the way for sale of shares in the state-owned firm. "The approval of the Competent Authority for appointment of former RBI Deputy Governor Usha Thorat, former Finance Secretary Arun Ramanathan and Deepak Nayyar, ex-vice chancellor of the Delhi University as independent or non-executive directors on the ONGC Board has been received," an oil ministry official said.  With this, ONGC now meets market regulator SEBI's listing requirement of having equal number of executive and non- executive directors, paving the way for the follow-on public offer (FPO).  "The timing of the public offer will however be decided by the Department of Disinvestment (DoD)," he said.  The public offer in which the government plans to sell 5 per cent (427.77 million shares) was scheduled to open on July 5 and close on July 8. "To keep those timelines, three independent directors needed to fulfill Sebi's listing requirement should have been appointed by June 14,"he said, adding the delay in appointment meant that the FPO will be pushed back by at least one week. After the appointments are made, ONGC will need 3 full working days to prepare papers for filling with the market regulator. As per the July 5 timeline, ONGC was supposed to file red herring prospectus (RHP) for the FPO by June 17 and roadshows to promote it were to start soon after that.
ET

Bank MF arms may get nod to sponsor infrastructure funds

New Delhi: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is likely to allow domestic banks to participate in the proposed infrastructure debt funds as sponsors through their mutual fund arms. The central bank's move is in the backdrop of series of consultations which the finance ministry has held with it on this subject. The ministry is also in discussions with market regulator Sebi and insurance regulator IRDA on the issue. A finance ministry official told FE that RBI had agreed to allow banks to be strategic sponsors of infrastructure debt funds through their mutual funds arms. Leading banks such as State Bank of India, ICICI and Bank of India have mutual fund arms through which infrastructure projects can be financed. The government is struggling to find long-term funds for infrastructure development, as banks cannot be exposed to the sector beyond a prudent limit. The maturity of bank deposits ranges from three to five years. Providing long-term loans from these medium-term funds creates a serious asset-liability mismatch for the banks. Experts believe that since the debt market in the country is not fully established, domestic banks remain the primary source of funds for these projects. Exploring options like making available bank funds through asset management companies and mutual fund arms will be beneficial for the cash starved infrastructure projects. “ The concept of extending line of funding through the mutual fund arm over and above the funding provided by banks on a project-to-project basis will be beneficial for the infrastructure sector. On the debt side, banks are the main source of finding apart from IDFC, IIFCL etc. Some of the banks have already crossed the sectoral cap for financing infrastructure projects. Financing through the mutual fund arm will compensate poor debt financing options available in the country,” said Sushi Shyamal, partner, infrastructure sector, Ernst & Young. Inadequate funding to the infrastructure funding has delayed the development of the sector. Under current regulations, Indian pension and insurance companies cannot invest directly in infrastructure projects, limiting a crucial source of finding. In the current Five-Year Plan that runs till March 31, 2012, such funds are likely to contribute less than 7% to total investment in projects. The finance ministry, along with the regulators, has been discussing whether the debt fund should take the form of a company or trust. The ministry will prepare the framework for both the structures and then let the promoters choose the model. It is expected that the debt fund as a company would raise funds through issuance of bonds. These could also be dollar denominated bonds. An official said, “It has been decided that maturity of these bonds will be 5-7 years.” The trust could raise money through tradeable financial instruments. The proposed debt funds can only be formed by an India registered company and the lead sponsors of the fund should be Indian. The fund can seek foreign investment from foreign pension and insurance funds through the external commercial borrowing route or foreign institutional investment route. The finance ministry has sought relaxation in the exposure limit and capital adequacy norms from the banking regulator for the proposed infrastructure debt fund, a senior official told FE. The modalities of the fund are expected to be finalised by June-end. Relaxation in exposure limit and capital adequacy norms would enable the debt fund to finance larger number of projects needing bigger funding. Under the RBI guidelines, an infrastructure finance company (IFC) can lend up to 25% of its net own funds to a single borrower and 40% to single group borrowers. “Our aim is to encourage maximum number of projects, so we are seeking relaxation in the exposure limits,” the official said. With regard to capital adequacy or Capital to Risk Asset Ratio (CRAR), RBI guidelines stipulate that NBFCs maintain 15% CRAR with a minimum Tier I capital of 10%.
FE

State lags in implementing financial inclusion plan

Commercial banks in Karnataka have been advised to speed up the efforts to achieve financial inclusion by the end of the present financial year. Presently, the banks in the state are lagging in meeting the deadline of March 2012 fixed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The slow pace in meeting the financial inclusion deadline is mainly on account of the delays in selecting the technology provider and absence of core banking system amongst the regional rural banks (RRBs). As of December 2010, Karnataka-based banks stood only behind Uttar Pradesh in implementing financial inclusion programme. As against the target of achieving financial inclusion in 3,395 villages with a population of over 2,000 by the end of fiscal 2011-12, the banking sector in the state has been able to provide banking services to 1,571 villages, which is 46 per cent of the target, by March 2011. The financial inclusion programme was launched on April 1, 2010. The RBI had asked banks in Karnataka to complete the first phase of the financial inclusion by the end of March 2012 with an intermediate target of March, 2011. However, as of March this year, the banks have met less than half the target, according to data available with the State Level Bankers’ Committee (SLBC). The selection of technology provider through a detailed tendering process is said to have delayed the implementation. The banks had to select a technology and hardware provider based on the guidelines of the Institute for Development and Research in Banking Technology (IDRBT). “The main problem was integration of handheld machines with the servers of respective banks in a secured manner and this took long time,” banking sources said. The ministry of finance had asked the SLBC to furnish a roadmap for extending banking facilities to all villages with a population of over 2,000 and furnish district wise, block wise and branch wise details. It also advised banks to indicate the time schedule for providing banking facilities for a period of two years from 2010-11 and 2011-12. Subsequently, the banks provided their respective boards approved plans indicating that they would meet the target by March 2012. “The target is achievable by March 2012. However, some banks like RRBs had a huge target ahead of them as most RRBs were not fully-equipped with core banking solutions and technology to implement the programme,” banking sources said. Basant Seth, chairman of Syndicate Bank and convenor of SLBC, has advised banks in Karnataka to implement the roadmap for providing banking services in their respective villages by March 2012. “While we appreciate the efforts of the bankers in Karnataka for their good performance, banks are requested to provide banking services in the remaining 1,804 villages at the earliest,” he said. Meanwhile, the banks in Karnataka have also prepared the list of unbanked villages with population of less than 1,000 for implementating the financial inclusion plan simultaneously. There are 6,383 villages with a population of 1,000 to 2,000 based on the data obtained from the government of Karnataka. Of these, 297 villages already have banking services, 24 villages are now within the urban area and 33 villages could not be identified. About 6,029 villages have been identified as unbanked.
BS

Three-day microfinance summit begins today

Irrespective of what the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) thinks about the role of microfinance institutions (MFIs), the recent actions of the Andhra Pradesh government against these organisations for their alleged excesses in lending to the rural poor, have now assumed a pan-India significance..........

Read more.................

It’s wise to keep tab on your bank’s concentration risk

The RBI disclosure rule requires the banks to calculate the amount of advances attributable to 20 largest borrowers on the basis of sanctioned lending limits and not the actual lended amount which.......

Continue reading............

RBI holds interface session on FEMA

CHENNAI: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), in association with Foreign Exchange Dealers' Association of India (FEDAI), organised an event ‘Foreign exchange for you' in Chennai on June 18 and 19. It was an exhibition-cum-interface session on Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999. The objective was to familiarise the public with the rules and regulations under FEMA governing the current and capital account transactions, remittance and exchange facilities and to seek feedback on policies and procedures related to forex transactions, says a release from the RBI.
Hindu

Mobiles ring in economic growth for urban poor: IIMA study

Amid reports of the harmful effects of excessive cellphone use, here is something good to say about mobile phones. The poor in metro cities have gained financially by using cellphones, says a working paper by two researchers......

Click to read.........

Special allowance for SBI employees irks union

The National Union of Bank Employees (NUBE) has decided to disaffiliate itself from the National Confederation of Bank Employees (NCBE) due to differences on using the amount allocated for the benefit of bank retirees as a ‘special balancing allowance' for employees of State Bank of India. With the special balancing allowance, the salaries of State Bank of India employees are higher than other bank employees. Mr L. Balasubramanian, General Secretary, NUBE, told Business Line, “The union of State Bank of India has used Rs 277 crore, the amount allocated for employee's pension as special balancing allowance.” This works out to be a hike of 6.5 per cent in basic pay of SBI employees. According to the 9th Bipartite Settlement, the pension cost was estimated at Rs 6,000 crore of which 70 per cent will be borne by the management of banks and the remaining 30 per cent will be contributed by the employees. The Indian Banks Association (IBA), which represents the management of banks, offered Rs 4,201 crore as its contribution towards the cost of pension payment for employees. Mr Balasubramanian said, of the Rs 4,201 crore, about Rs 277 crore which was paid as pension to SBI employees, has been used as a ‘special balance allowance'. With the pension scheme already available for SBI employees (apart from provident fund and gratuity), the union of SBI did not sign the memorandum, he said. Such appropriation of pension amount for a special allowance is a “flagrant violation of the trade unions' cardinal principle, ‘same work same pay”, he said. Mr Balasubramanian said the All India State Bank of India Staff Federation has “betrayed” the other members of NCBE by getting more salary hike for SBI employees alone. NCBE largely comprises All India State Bank of India Staff Federation and has about 1.58 lakh employees as members. NCBE is the second largest union after All India Bank Employees Association which has about 2.1 lakh members as on March 31, 2010.
Business Line