My View on "'Pay revision' and 'Pension updation' two sides of...":
Shri A. Chandramouliswaran Sir would like some clarification- whether pay and pension revision should be in 'consonance' with GOI, once in 10 years.Otherwise, it would not be possible to ensure that all pensioners who have retired in the same grade but at different points of time, draw the same quantum of pension. I try to clarify /submit to the best of my knowledge. A letter published in the FPJ dated 05-10-2013 (reproduced) reflects the present/actual -pension drawn - position of -Civil-pensioners retired at different points of time.{ Defence pensioners are getting / going to get-once the formalities are complete effective from this month of April, 2014, OROP-same rank same pension depending on length of service in the same grade/rank etc} Unrectified pension anomaly-GOI There is an issue related to government pensioners that remains unresolved for over a decade: government pensioners not getting One Rank One Pension (OROP) based on length of qualifying service etc. This is a reasonable demand, as majority of the pre-2006 pensioners are living in low dignity compared to post-2006 pensioners in the midst of similar conditions of spiraling prices and skyrocketing inflation. Pre- 2006 pensioners have been granted pension as per the fitment formula – not less than 50% of the revised ( 2006) minimum pay and grade pay relevant to the scale of pay that the employee has retired (family pensioners- 30 percent). To mention by way of a single illustration : a pensioner who retired between Jan 1 , 1996 and December 31,2005 at the maximum of the scale corresponding to the 2006 scale of PB4: Rs 37000 to Rs 67000 plus grade pay of Rs 10000 is assured of Rs 27350 in pension and a family pension of Rs. 16410 as per fitment, as against Rs 38,500 and Rs 23,100 respectively drawn by a post 2006 retiree at the end scale- at maximum.
This kind of discrimination amongst retirees is neither just nor equitable. Such anomalies should be addressed at the very earliest. Kindly see below -added to the above letter in order to make the point clearer. 5th CPC revision in GOI :The fixation of pension was subject to the ' provision, in no case, shall be lower than 50% of the revised 1996 pay relevant to the scale of pay that the employee had retired. IF THE ABOVE MENTIONED PROVISO -NOT LESS THAN 50%..granted to old pensioners was not in the fitment formula :
(A)The basic pension of Shri K. Ganesh, my neighbour, a pensioner retired in 1988 at the maximum in the 4th CPC scale-01-01-1986 (S-29 scale : the same relevant 2006 quoted in the letter : Rs.5900--Rs.7300) would have been Rs.7300/2=Rs.3650. He got pension revision as per 5th CPC(1996) and subsequently, in 2008, he got pension revision as per 6th CPC(2006). HIS revised basic pension is Rs.27350/- .He is not 'rotting' at the basic pension of Rs.3650/- (Although the basic pension of 'old' 1997, Nov. pay scales- RBI retirees and 2002, Nov. pay scales -RBI retirees is remaining unchanged/not revised but not 'rotting' as they get 228.96% and 144.54% dearness relief respectively and those retired in 2007, Nov. pay scales get 99.90% DR.
(B)Shri M.P.Kulkarni retired in 1998 at the maximum in the 5th CPC-01-01-1996 (the same S-29 scale)---Rs.18400-Rs22400. His basic has been revised to Rs.27350/-.
A note posted in VITALINFO-'OROP@2007: Loud but logical' may be seen.
- R.G.Nakhate
If it is really so than Association/Unions should drop demand of pension updation.
1. Wage revision once is 5 years is always better compare to once in 10 years that too depends on the mercy of Govt.
2.Pension updation in Govt. Of India is not statutory in nature and a result of a executive order(notification), What if govt. stops updating the pension for its employees in future.
3. As on date some sizable allowances qualify for DA in Bank , what if these are excluded from the definition of Pay.It will result in reduction in salary of existing employees.
4. In commercial banks only non optees paid the price of option i.e. refund of employers share with interest and some extra money as trade off. Why should all employees pay the price for few non optees.
5. There may be a immediate decrease in pension amount if some allowances are left out.How wise will it be to take less pension today to get some benefit after 10 years.
6. Will it be possible to convince existing retirees to opt for a lesser pension in lieu of updation and present employees to give away their benefits which is going to affect their payments of loan EMI's, expenses of education of children etc.
7. Those joined bank after January 2012 has nothing to do with both option and updation. Why they should sacrifice their present pay and perqs for others?
This issue reached a stage where it will lead to loss to present employees to benefit retirees. It is best in the interest of all to drop this demand immediately and concentrate on revision of pay and perqs which are already due from November 2012.
- Anonymous